Advertisement
Peebles Acquires 87 Acres for Luxury Oceanfront Development
By Brian K. Miller
August 22, 2005 08:14am
PACIFICA, CA-Peebles Atlantic Development Corp. has acquired 87 acres of oceanfront here with plans to seek entitlements for a low-density, high-end mixed-use development. Plans for the former rock quarry located 15 minutes south of Downtown San Francisco include a luxury hotel, resort and residential uses with an expected sellout of nearly $1 billion.
The first step was acquiring the land, which PADC did using a $16.5-million non-recourse loan from North American Capital Advisors of Miami. NACA president Michael Browarnik says the financing represents 90% of the cost to acquire the land as well as all the predevelopment costs required to attain the necessary entitlements prior to breaking ground. The sale closed about 10 days ago.
PADC chief and business mogul R. Donahue Peebles tells GlobeSt.com he acquired the land for “just under $8 million,” which is a steal compared to the $20-million-plus he says Trammell Crow was under contract to pay for the property back in 2000. The seller in both instances was William F. Bottoms, who owned this and several other rock quarries.
“TCC went through the first phase of obtaining entitlements for an all-residential project but eventually decided to abandon the effort,” Peebles says. “We began negotiating with Mr. Bottoms after that and, subsequent to his death, began negotiating with his estate, the Bottoms Family Trust, which was looking to liquidate more quickly. We understand our lender’s appraisal came back at significant multiples of our purchase price.”
The property sits between the main highway and the ocean. PADC envisions the development as “extremely low density,” with the residential units “extremely exclusive” and the hotel “five-star.”
“What we are looking at is single-family homes, a luxury hotel, some condominiums and some retail on a portion of the site close to the main streets,” Peebles says. “We could build over 2.2 million sf of commercial on the property, but we’re going to do significantly less than that in order to have a lot of open space; it’s good for the environment and consistent with our want to have far more quality than quantity.”
Peebles says the hotel will have 200 to 300 rooms and there will be about 300 units of housing, about half single-family and half multifamily (most likely condominiums). The single-family homes will sell for between $3 million and $8 million, he says.
“The closest thing to what we are going to do is Half Moon Bay,” he says. “The difference is Half Moon Bay is a ways off the ocean; our property will on a bluff right above the ocean, providing fantastic views of the Bay and Downtown San Francisco.”
The current retail plan calls for about 160,000 sf of boutique retail and restaurant space in smaller buildings. “We’d like to take the main shopping corridor that runs parallel to the ocean and just extend it into our site,” he says. “It will be similar to Carmel by the Sea.”
Peebles says the property abuts a public golf course that is owned and operated by the City of San Francisco. “We are going to work with the City of Pacifica to obtain a management contract and restore the course and use it as more of an attraction to the area,” Peebles says. “It’s a beautiful course that runs right along the Pacific Ocean.”
Peebles estimates the total development cost at about $500 million. He expects the entitlement process to take between 18 months to two years. The first phase will likely consist of the residential and hotel uses, he says.
“We’ve already has meetings with the Sierra Club and other environmental groups and have engaged in extensive talks with the city,” he says. “We also will be working closely with the California Coastal Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency and residents to create a development plan that is “mutually beneficial.”
Established in 1987, PADC is a real estate development company specializing in luxury hotel, residential and office projects. The company has $1 billion worth of developments under way in Washington, DC, Miami and Detroit. The Pacifica development is part of business mogul R. Donahue Peebles’ plans to establish a major presence on the West Coast. The Pacifica Property marks the company’s first West Coast acquisition. Other acquisitions are in the works.
Peebles tells GlobeSt.com he is under contract to purchase a Downtown San Francisco office building in the heart of south of Market District that he plans to demolish in favor of a luxury 50-story retail, office and residential tower. He expects to close on the site by early fall. As well, he says there's a well-known San Francisco hotel he’d like to acquire. Beyond the Bay Area, he’d like to explore opportunities in Los Angeles and Las Vegas, he says.
www.globest.com/news/353_3...7508-1.html
By Brian K. Miller
August 22, 2005 08:14am
PACIFICA, CA-Peebles Atlantic Development Corp. has acquired 87 acres of oceanfront here with plans to seek entitlements for a low-density, high-end mixed-use development. Plans for the former rock quarry located 15 minutes south of Downtown San Francisco include a luxury hotel, resort and residential uses with an expected sellout of nearly $1 billion.
The first step was acquiring the land, which PADC did using a $16.5-million non-recourse loan from North American Capital Advisors of Miami. NACA president Michael Browarnik says the financing represents 90% of the cost to acquire the land as well as all the predevelopment costs required to attain the necessary entitlements prior to breaking ground. The sale closed about 10 days ago.
PADC chief and business mogul R. Donahue Peebles tells GlobeSt.com he acquired the land for “just under $8 million,” which is a steal compared to the $20-million-plus he says Trammell Crow was under contract to pay for the property back in 2000. The seller in both instances was William F. Bottoms, who owned this and several other rock quarries.
“TCC went through the first phase of obtaining entitlements for an all-residential project but eventually decided to abandon the effort,” Peebles says. “We began negotiating with Mr. Bottoms after that and, subsequent to his death, began negotiating with his estate, the Bottoms Family Trust, which was looking to liquidate more quickly. We understand our lender’s appraisal came back at significant multiples of our purchase price.”
The property sits between the main highway and the ocean. PADC envisions the development as “extremely low density,” with the residential units “extremely exclusive” and the hotel “five-star.”
“What we are looking at is single-family homes, a luxury hotel, some condominiums and some retail on a portion of the site close to the main streets,” Peebles says. “We could build over 2.2 million sf of commercial on the property, but we’re going to do significantly less than that in order to have a lot of open space; it’s good for the environment and consistent with our want to have far more quality than quantity.”
Peebles says the hotel will have 200 to 300 rooms and there will be about 300 units of housing, about half single-family and half multifamily (most likely condominiums). The single-family homes will sell for between $3 million and $8 million, he says.
“The closest thing to what we are going to do is Half Moon Bay,” he says. “The difference is Half Moon Bay is a ways off the ocean; our property will on a bluff right above the ocean, providing fantastic views of the Bay and Downtown San Francisco.”
The current retail plan calls for about 160,000 sf of boutique retail and restaurant space in smaller buildings. “We’d like to take the main shopping corridor that runs parallel to the ocean and just extend it into our site,” he says. “It will be similar to Carmel by the Sea.”
Peebles says the property abuts a public golf course that is owned and operated by the City of San Francisco. “We are going to work with the City of Pacifica to obtain a management contract and restore the course and use it as more of an attraction to the area,” Peebles says. “It’s a beautiful course that runs right along the Pacific Ocean.”
Peebles estimates the total development cost at about $500 million. He expects the entitlement process to take between 18 months to two years. The first phase will likely consist of the residential and hotel uses, he says.
“We’ve already has meetings with the Sierra Club and other environmental groups and have engaged in extensive talks with the city,” he says. “We also will be working closely with the California Coastal Commission, the Environmental Protection Agency and residents to create a development plan that is “mutually beneficial.”
Established in 1987, PADC is a real estate development company specializing in luxury hotel, residential and office projects. The company has $1 billion worth of developments under way in Washington, DC, Miami and Detroit. The Pacifica development is part of business mogul R. Donahue Peebles’ plans to establish a major presence on the West Coast. The Pacifica Property marks the company’s first West Coast acquisition. Other acquisitions are in the works.
Peebles tells GlobeSt.com he is under contract to purchase a Downtown San Francisco office building in the heart of south of Market District that he plans to demolish in favor of a luxury 50-story retail, office and residential tower. He expects to close on the site by early fall. As well, he says there's a well-known San Francisco hotel he’d like to acquire. Beyond the Bay Area, he’d like to explore opportunities in Los Angeles and Las Vegas, he says.
www.globest.com/news/353_3...7508-1.html
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: East Coast Developer "Steals" Pacifica Quarry Property
Tue, August 23, 2005 - 12:57 PMWe live i Vallemar and this seems like a good idea for the quarry. As long as the plans do not allow for hte developer to change the plans if certain things do not happen.
The problem with the last time is that the developer had too many ways to change the plans so the voters turned down the residential part of the plan which screwed the whole thing for he developer as that is wehre the money was.
Nowhere in that article does it mention a vote of the Pacifica residents. I believe if there is going to be a change in the zoning to allow for housing it has to go to a vote.
What is describe in the article would be a nice addition to pacifica if it turns out to be what is written. Anything other than a big box store. Although, I cannot image a big box store coming to pacifica as it would ot get the customers it needs sinec pacifica is so cut off from any other city.
Can't imagin anyone paying $8M for a huse in Pacifica unless it took up the entire quarry.
Willy in Pacifica
-
Re: East Coast Developer "Steals" Pacifica Quarry Property
Thu, May 18, 2006 - 4:19 PMNews Flash!
Peebles' concept will not work in the quarry. Why? Because it is in the coastal zone (regulated by the California Coastal Act) and contains endangered species. The barriers to development in this area are huge so Peebles should just donate the land to the GGNRA. Imagine if the quarry and Mori Point were one inclusive recreational area?
Rememeber Measure E in 2002 when voters in Pacifica quashed the proposed development by a 3:1 margin? Well, get ready to relive it all again.
Say no to development in the quarry. -
-
Re: East Coast Developer "Steals" Pacifica Quarry Property
Fri, May 19, 2006 - 8:58 AMI voted against Measure E because there were too many ways for that developer to get around their vauge proposal if after the voters approved the zoning change to include homes.
I believe there could be a good use of the land with mixed residences, commercial, hotels, etc but the developer has to be up front with the voters and the developer has to be held to the plan voted on.
I do not want all residences or all business on the land. But Pacifica can really use a good central location similar to HMBs business district. I would love to be able to walk to the area and hit a diner on the weekends or go to a book store.
Just not sure how economical it will be with small businesses like in HMB. I would guess the more voter friendly businesses (small businesses) will require more residential building to make up tfor he developers profit.
My thinking is
Non friendly businesses + less residences = friendly businesses + more residences.
Non friendly business = box type stores
firendly businesses = local book stores, diners, etc.
Willy in Valemar
-
Re: East Coast Developer "Steals" Pacifica Quarry Property
Fri, May 26, 2006 - 4:20 PMHi Melissa,
The lead architect on this project (Andres Duany) was the keynote speaker at World Environment Day last year. He is a major player in the environmental movement, and his firm is widely respected in the design community.
Like you, I am a passionate environmentalist, and a consistent supporter of the Nature Conservancy, which is all about preserving open space. Having done a lot of due diligence on this project, I believe this plan will be good for the earth as well as good for Pacifica. So, I encourage you to learn more about it before dismissing it out of hand.
If there are endangered species involved, the Coastal Commission will be all over it. They are notoriously strict, so you and I don't really need to worry about that part. The sad truth is that this land has been raped and pillaged already so it is not in very good shape right now. I feel it will be nice to see at least a part of it restored to its natural beauty.
-
-
Re: East Coast Developer "Steals" Pacifica Quarry Property
Thu, June 29, 2006 - 9:39 PMWhen millions of dollars are involved, it's probably best to remain as objective as possible -- Duany's past environmental credentials may or may not be relevant here. Those of us concerned about the environmental impact of this project need to stay focused on exactly that and not be distracted by the developer's claims. I and my wife went to a number of the charrette meetings, for example. As she pressed Duany about the endangered species on the site, he responded peevishly with "Well, I might as well just quite right now." He went on to say that "People here seem to have a theology about the snakes and frogs." In short, he's got his motives and goals, and they may not be consistent with ours.
I disagree with your observation on the state of the Quarry. Yes, it has been abused, and it may not present much "natural beauty" to some humans, but our local wildlife has a different perspective. You may have heard that the endangered California Red-Legged Frog has been found all over the property. We've seen meadlowlarks, pipits, and white-tailed kites there. During our walk there last weekend, a red-tailed hawk dropped down into the brush near us to grab a snack. Native plants are getting established there, too: we found lizartail, seaside daisy, and the native strawberry.
Finally, given the relentless assaults on environmental regulations and regulatory agencies by the so-called Wise Use movement and its property-rights allies, I think it's dangerous to believe that you and I and other passionate environmentalists really don't need to worry about the protection of endangered species. At the very least, we need to express our concerns to the developer and provide supportive input to the Coastal Commission and the other agencies involved in environmental protection. -
-
Re: East Coast Developer "Steals" Pacifica Quarry Property
Thu, June 29, 2006 - 10:33 PMThe California Coastal Commission is a notoriously political body: what we need is a solid public no vote in November on this attempt to rezone the quarry for residential housing.
A decisive no vote will stiffen the spines of our elected officials, who are directly targeted by the ingenious way in which this campaign is being conducted. The developer is circumventing the regulatory process in having ballot language that goes directly to the city council, rather than the planning commission or city staff for review. The pressure upon the council would be tremendous were this ill-advised proposal to pass.
To quote our moderator's posting of 2005 :
"Plans for the former rock quarry ... include a luxury hotel, resort and residential uses with an expected sellout of nearly $1 billion."
That's what it's all about people, filthy lucre.
-Lionel Emde
-
-
Re: East Coast Developer "Steals" Pacifica Quarry Property
Fri, June 30, 2006 - 9:04 AMHi, Shannon,
There are, indeed, endangered species and critical habitat for those species in the Quarry. There is both the California red-legged frog (just yesterday I talked to some people doing trapping studies along Calera creek for the developers who acknowledged that the frogs are present on the site) as well as the critically endangered San Francisco garter snake (and there may be others as well). I don't think their continued existence is something to be defered to someone else, not if you are a passionate environmentalist. The "someone else" may be busy with the thousands of other sites where species are under threat throughout the state. The "someone else" may not be under political threat or pressure. The "someone else" maybe not be as passionate as you are.
As an environmental attorney since 1982 who is very familiar both with the career of Andres Duany and the Coastal Commission, my opinion is that it is dangerous to trust all will turn out well simply because well-known people say "Don't worry." When big money is on one side of the balance and endangered species are on the other - the outcome usually isn't very pleasant for the voiceless creatures. That's a large part of why so many are endangered. To make sure that the species are protected, ordinary people must insist that they are protected. They can't trust the planner or develeoper, who have other agendas (involving making big bucks).
Here's a major problem: the Peebles-Duany development proposal is not a plan that has been written down and approved by the City Council. There is no legal way to hold the owner/architect to their "promises" made at the charrette. Those claims can't be relied upon. Ask yourself why the owner/architect aren't willing to stand behind their plan. The answer I come up with is this: they want the freedom to things differently if voters give them permission to build up to 355 houses in the quarry.
Does the community want to give this blank check? All bets are off regarding green building, energy efficiency, town halls, libraries. If the referendum succeeds, the developer/architect will do what they want to do. Is the community willing to be that trusting?
Yes, there are endangered species in the site. But neither the developer nor the architect is not an advocate for them. If we aren't, who is?
Janet
-
-
Re: East Coast Developer "Steals" Pacifica Quarry Property
Sat, July 1, 2006 - 4:36 PMSome friends and I have put up some more information here: www.pacificaquarry.org .
I've included a link to your report about the developer's employees trapping frogs at the site. It would help to take a digital camera with you when hiking, and if you get pictures of this activity, post them here or email them to truth@pacificaquarry.org ... or both.
-
-
-